Fatores afetivos na aprendizagem estatística em contexto STEAM-h

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.42168

Palavras-chave:

STEAM-h, Fatores afetivos, Aprendizagem matemática, Estatística, Relações interpessoais, Ensino interdisciplinar

Resumo

Este artigo analisa o impacto da abordagem STEAM-h no desenvolvimento de fatores afetivos na aprendizagem da Matemática, com foco na Estatística e nas competências interpessoais. A intervenção, de natureza qualitativa e com orientação de investigação-ação, decorreu com alunos do 11.º ano, integrando a exploração de problemas reais e socialmente relevantes em projetos interdisciplinares. A recolha de dados incluiu questionários, portefólios, observações e reflexões escritas. Os resultados revelam um aumento expressivo na motivação, no interesse e na perceção da utilidade da Estatística, bem como na qualidade das interações entre os alunos. A personalização temática, a colaboração e o acompanhamento contínuo da professora foram identificados como fatores importantes para o envolvimento cognitivo e emocional dos alunos. A análise evidencia que a articulação entre exigência disciplinar e apoio relacional promoveu aprendizagens significativas e um ambiente emocionalmente seguro. Estes dados corroboram os referenciais teóricos que valorizam a dimensão afetiva da aprendizagem, sugerindo que o modelo STEAM-h contribui para uma educação matemática mais humanizada, inclusiva e alinhada com os desafios contemporâneos. O estudo reforça a importância de integrar intencionalmente a componente relacional no ensino da matemática, reconhecendo os alunos como sujeitos ativos, emocionais e colaborativos no processo de construção do conhecimento.

Referências

Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de conteúdo (Ed. revista e atualizada). Edições 70.

Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2022). A pedagogical model for STEAM education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0081.

Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi delta kappan, 92(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119

Boaler, J. (2016). Designing mathematics classes to promote equity and engagement. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.002

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Bush, S. B., Cox, R., & Cook, K. L. (2016). A critical focus on the M in STEAM. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(2), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.2.0110

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997).Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1997.11990723

Conradty, C., Bogner, F.X. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 13, 27-48. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z

Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., Blanco, T. F., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project-based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9

Eynde, P. O. T., Corte, E. D., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9034-4

Fernandes, D. (2019). Para um enquadramento teórico da avaliação formativa e da avaliação sumativa das aprendizagens escolares. In A. M. Fidalgo & D. Fernandes (Orgs.), Avaliar para aprender em Portugal e no Brasil: Perspectivas teóricas, práticas e de desenvolvimento (pp. 139–164). Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013, June). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Collaborative Impact.

Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x

Garfield, J. B., Ben-Zvi, D., Chance, B., Medina, E., Roseth, C., & Zieffler, A. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer.

Garfield, J., Le, L., Zieffler, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Developing students’ reasoning about samples and sampling variability as a path to expert statistical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9541-7

Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective Pathways and Representation in Mathematical Problem Solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0203_3

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9019-8

Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics-related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694281

Hargie, O. (2021). Skilled interpersonal communication: Research, theory and practice (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003182269

Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Direção-Geral da Educação. (2018). Aprendizagens essenciais – Matemática A – 11.º ano (Despacho n.º 8476-A/2018). Ministério da Educação. https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Curriculo/Aprendizagens_Essenciais/mat_a_11_-_vf.pdf

Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.15

Jansen, A., & Middleton, J. (2011). Motivation Matters and Interest Counts: Fostering Engagement in Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge University Press.

Martins, G. O., Gomes, C. A. S., Brocardo, J. M. L., Pedroso, J. V., Carrillo, J. L. A., Ucha Silva, L. M., Alves da Encarnação, M. M. G., Horta, M. J. V. C., Calçada, M. T. C. S., Vieira Nery, R. F., & Rodrigues, S. M. C. V. (2017). Perfil dos alunos à saída da escolaridade obrigatória. Direção-Geral da Educação. https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Curriculo/Projeto_Autonomia_e_Flexibilidade/perfil_dos_alunos.pdf

McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 575-596.

Montés, N., Barquero, S., Martínez-Carbonell, A., Aloy, P., Ferrer, T., Romero, P. D., Millan, M., & Salazar, A. S. (2024). Redefining STEAM to STEAM ∀H (STEAM for All Humanity) in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080888

Monteiro, C., & Ainley, J. (2007). Investigating the interpretation of media graphs among student teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 187-207.

OECD. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note.pdf

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232555

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN.

Lee, B. X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., Cohen, L., Donnelly, P. D., Muggah, R., ... & Gilligan, J. (2016). Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of public health policy, 37(Suppl 1), 13-31. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-016-0002-7

Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2014). Two-way tables: Issues at the heart of statistics and probability for students and teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(4), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.953019

Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The montana mathematics enthusiast, 3(1), 157-168.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-12-31

Como Citar

Mota, A. C. S. L. da, & Martinho, M. H. (2025). Fatores afetivos na aprendizagem estatística em contexto STEAM-h . Quadrante, 34(2), 99–133. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.42168

Edição

Secção

Artigos