O que torna um problema de modelação interessante? Fontes de interesse situacional em problemas de modelação

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.23861

Palavras-chave:

interesse, problemas do mundo real, emoções, contexto, modelação, conceções de eficácia

Resumo

Estudos anteriores mostram que os alunos possuem poucas competências de modelação e um dos motivos para isso pode estar relacionado com o pouco interesse em resolver problemas de modelação. Por conhecermos ainda pouco relativamente a fontes de interesse em problemas de modelação, desenvolvemos um estudo qualitativo que procura conhecer as fontes de interesse dos alunos em problemas de modelação. Definiram-se as seguintes questões de investigação: (1) Quais as fontes de interesse que os alunos referem para problemas de modelação? (2) A realização das tarefas influencia o interesse dos alunos por problemas de modelação e pelos contextos situacionais? Com esse propósito, apresentámos quatro problemas de modelação a 5 alunos do 9.° ano e solicitá­mos que os alunos ordenassem os problemas de acordo com o seu interesse e que justificassem essa ordenação antes e depois de terem resolvido os problemas. A análise qualitativa mostra duas fontes principais de interesse dos alunos: emoções relacionadas com o contexto do mundo real apresentado no problema e as conceções dos alunos sobre a sua eficácia. Os resultados sustentam a importância das emoções especificamente relacionadas com as tarefas e conceções de eficácia que têm sido discutidas na teoria de interesse e mostram o papel dos contextos do mundo real na ativação do interesse em problemas de modelação. 

Referências

Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205-227). New York: Routledge.

Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

Albarracín, L., Ferrando, I., & Gorgorió, N. (2020). The role of context for characterising students’ strategies when estimating large numbers of elements on a surface. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10107-4

Albert, M., Hurrelmann, K., & Quenzel, G. (2015). 17. Shell Jugendstudie. Jugend 2015. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freemann.

Bandura, A. (2009). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In E. A. Locke, (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organization behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 179-200). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch10

Baierl, O. (2018). Hitzedrahtampermeter. Retrieved from https://www.physikalische-schulexperimente.de/physo/Hitzedrahtampermeter.

Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 73–96). Cham: Springer.

Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with mathematical modelling problems? The example sugarloaf and the DISUM project. In C. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood.

Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects-state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302716

Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research. An introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38

Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715

Deci, E. L. (1998). The relation of interest to motivation and human needs – The self-determination theory viewpoint. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.) Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon-conference on interest and gender (pp. 146-162). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309

Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Dicke, A. L., & Goetz, T. (2012). Beyond quantitative decline: Conceptual shifts in adolescents' development of interest in mathematics. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1069-1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026895

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316

Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2017). Eliciting mathematics interest: New directions for context personalization and example choice. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 597-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268085

Kaiser-Meßmer, G. (1986): Anwendungen im Mathematikunterricht. Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker.

Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1

Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007

Krawitz, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2018). Do students value modelling problems, and are they confident they can solve such problems? Value and self-efficacy for modelling, word, and intra-mathematical problems. ZDM Mathematics Education 50, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0893-1

Krug, A., & Schukajlow, S. (2013). Problems with and without connection to reality and students’ task-specific interest. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 209–216). Kiel, Germany: PME.

López, C. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1992). Effect of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of Hispanic students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296895

Maaß, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(2), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-010-0010-2

Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. L. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In R. E. Snow, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitudes, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analysis (pp. 223-254). Hillsday, New York: Erlbaum.

Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und techniken. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424

Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. L. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 1–32). New York: Springer.

Parhizgar, Z., & Liljedahl, P. (2019). Teaching modelling problems and its effects on students’ engagement and attitude toward mathematics. In S. Chamberlin, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Affect in mathematical modeling (pp. 235-256). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04432-9_15

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Rellensmann, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2017). Does students’ interest in a mathematical problem depend on the problem’s connection to reality? An analysis of students’ interest and pre-service teachers’ judgments of students’ interest in problems with and without a connection to reality. ZDM, 49(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0819-3

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2020). Measuring and investigating strategic knowledge about drawing to solve geometry modelling problems. ZDM, 52(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01085-1

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5

Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Schreyer, I. (1993). Metaanalyse des Zusammenhangs von Interesse und schulischer Leistung. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 120-148.

Schiefele, U., & Schreyer, I. (1994). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen. Ein Überblick zu Ergebnissen der Forschung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 8, 1-13.

Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014a). Are interest and enjoyment important for students' performance? In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 129–136). PME.

Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014b). Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497-533. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0497

Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2

Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0864-6

Downloads

Publicado

2021-06-30

Como Citar

Schulze Elfringhoff, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2021). O que torna um problema de modelação interessante? Fontes de interesse situacional em problemas de modelação. Quadrante, 30(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.23861

Edição

Secção

Artigos