Learning opportunities experienced by teachers when collectively discussing a lesson on patterns and regularities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.23010Keywords:
in-service teacher education, learning opportunities, mathematics teachers’ learning, collective discussions, teaching of algebra, patterns and regularitiesAbstract
In this paper, the results of a research that aims to identify and understand how professional learning opportunities emerge when teachers collectively discuss and analyze a lesson involving patterns and regularities in basic school are presented. The study was developed from the perspective of a qualitative-interpretative research and data analyzed consists of protocols for the resolution of formative tasks, audios and videos collected during the teacher education process for in-service teachers. The results of the study show that professional learning tasks enable teachers to discuss students' and teaching knowledge about patterns and regularities. It was observed that the format of these tasks, containing records of practice, combined with the actions of teacher educators during collective discussions, favored the participants to differentiate and understand the students' reasoning processes, such as the use of tabular representation in understanding algebraic thinking. Finally, the relevance of the learning opportunities that teachers experienced when they validated and rethought, together with the class teacher herself, the choices and decisions made by her during her class was also identified.
References
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
Ball, D. L., Ben-Peretz, M., & Cohen, R. B. (2014). Records of practice and the development of collective professional knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 317-335.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2009). Strengthening practice in and research on the professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: Next steps. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study (pp. 255-257). New York, NY: Springer.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Helping elementary teachers build mathematical generality into curriculum and instruction. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(1), 34–42.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação. Porto: Porto Editora.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Seago, N., & Mangram, C. (2014). Facilitating video-based professional development: Planning and orchestrating productive discussions. In Y. Li et al. (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices, advances in mathematics education (pp. 259-281). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_16
Branco, N., & Ponte, J. P. (2014). Articulação entre pedagogia e conteúdo na formação inicial de professores dos primeiros anos: Uma experiência em Álgebra. In J. P. Ponte (Ed.), Práticas profissionais dos professores de matemática (pp. 379-408). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa.
Britt, M. S., & Irwin, K. C. (2011). Algebraic thinking with and without algebraic representation: A pathway for learning. In J. Cai & E. Knut (Eds.). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 137-157). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598-1608.
Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 3-22.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293-319.
Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 364-379.
Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Opportunities for learning given to prospective mathematics teachers: Between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 547-574.
Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21–34
Loucks-Horsley, S. (1997). Teacher change, staff development, and systemic change: Reflections from the eye of the paradigm. In S. N. Friel & G.W. Bright (Eds.). Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 133–150). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Martins, C., & Santos, L. (2012). O Programa de Formação Contínua em Matemática como contexto favorável para o desenvolvimento da capacidade de reflexão de professores do 1.º ciclo. Quadrante, 21(1), 95-119.
Pimenta, C. M. C., & Saraiva, J. M. (2019). As ações epistémicas na construção do novo conhecimento matemático e no desenvolvimento do pensamento algébrico. Quadrante, 28(1), 27-53.
Pimentel, T., & Vale, I. (2012). Os padrões e o raciocínio indutivo em matemática. Quadrante, 21(2), 29-50.
Ponte, J. P. (1999). Didácticas específicas e construção do conhecimento profissional. In J. Tavares et al. (Eds.), Investigar e formar em educação: Actas do IV congresso da SPCE (pp. 59-72). Porto: SPCE.
Ponte, J. P. (2012). Estudiando el conocimiento y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado de matemáticas. In N. Planas (Ed.), Teoría, crítica y práctica de la educación matemática (pp. 83-98). Barcelona: Graó.
Ponte, J. P. (2017). Discussões coletivas no ensino aprendizagem em Matemática. In GTI (Ed.), A prática dos professores: Planificação e discussão coletiva na sala de aula (pp. 33-56). Lisboa: APM.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2004). Uma abordagem à análise de dados de vídeo para investigar o desenvolvimento de ideias e raciocínios matemáticos de estudantes. Bolema, 17(21), 81-140.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. (2019). Professional learning opportunities in a practice-based teacher education program about the concept of function. Acta Scientiae, 21, 49-74. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss2id5002
Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning? In D. H. Gitomer, & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5ª ed., pp. 391-438). Washington (D.C.): American Educational Research Association.
Serrazina, M. L. (2013). O Programa de Formação Contínua em Matemática para Professores do 1.º ciclo e a melhoria do ensino da Matemática. Da investigação às práticas, 3(2), 75-97.
Serrazina, M. L. (2017). Planificação do ensino-aprendizagem da Matemática. In GTI (Ed.), A prática dos professores: Planificação e discussão coletiva na sala de aula (pp. 9-32). Lisboa: APM.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Silver, E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, Y. C., & Sealy, J. T. (2007). Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers’ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9039-7
Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.
Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 217-237.
Tatto, M. T., & Senk, S. (2011). The mathematics education of future primary and secondary teachers: Methods and findings from the teacher education and development study in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110391807
Trevisan, A. L., Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. D. (2020). Professional learning opportunities regarding the concept of function in a practice-based teacher education program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 702-739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330970
White, A. L., Jaworski, B., Agudelo-Valderrama, C., & Gooya, Z. (2013). Teachers learning from teachers. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, F. K. S. Leung (Eds), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 393-430). New York, NY: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2
Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379-402.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Quadrante

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) belongs to Quadrante. Nevertheless, we encourage articles to be published in institutional or personal repositories as long as their original publication in Quadrante is identified and a link to the journal's website is included.