A method for meta-reviews of research unfolding the unavoidable systemic nature of affect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.31565

Keywords:

qualitative meta-review, affective variables, unidimensional, multidimensional, affect system

Abstract

This paper can be considered a methodological contribution for qualitative meta-reviews of research published in the field of affect in mathematics education. We apply this method to a Special Issue and to an ICMI Book, in order to test whether affect emerges in its systemic nature, or whether single affective variables are considered in each paper under consideration. Different types of cases emerged in our investigation.

References

Achmetli, K., & Schukajlow, S. (2015). Multiple solutions, the experience of competence and interest. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 39–66). Springer.

Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemonte, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 1, pp. 179–204). PME.

Boero, P., & Planas, N. (2014). Habermas’ construct of rational behavior in mathematics education: New advances and research questions. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 1, pp. 205–235). PME.

Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice teacher leaders’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.003

Brown, L., & Reid, D. A. (2006). Embodied Cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9027-3

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey Bass.

De Simone, M. (2015). Intertwining of rationality and emotions in mathematics teaching: a case study. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 233–254). Springer.

DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4

Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0309-6

Dobie, T. E. (2015). A sociocultural examination of utility value in mathematics: The role of interdependence in middle school students’ perceptions of usefulness. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 67–88). Springer.

Evans, J., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9029-1

Goldin, G. A. (2014). Perspectives on emotion in mathematical engagement, learning, and problem solving. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 391–414). Taylor & Francis.

Graven, M., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Mathematics identity research: The state of the art and future directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01050-y

Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. McGraw-Hill.

Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. MIT Press.

Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9019-8

Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137−161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694281

Khalil, D., Lake, E., & Johnson, A. (2015). Teachers’ classroom engagement structures: A comparative study of a novice US and an experienced UK mathematics teacher. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 255−282). Springer.

Lerman, S., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). The socio-political context of the mathematics classroom: Using Bernstein’s theoretical framework to understand classroom communications. In P. Valero, & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 27−42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_4

Liljedahl, P. (2016). Flow: A framework for discussing teaching. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 203−210). PME.

Liljedahl, P. (2018). Affect as a system: The case of Sara. In B. Rott et al. (Eds), Views and beliefs in mathematics education (pp. 21−32), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01273-1_3

Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149−164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9022-8

McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp. 575−596). MacMillan.

Middleton, J. A., Mangu, D., & Lee, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of mathematics and science motivation: Patterns for STEM-intending high schoolers in the US. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 89−106). Springer.

Montoro, A. B., & Gil, F. (2015). Exploring flow in pre-service primary teachers doing measurement tasks. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 283−308). Springer.

Op’t Eynde, P., de Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193−207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472122

Rienstra, B., & Hook, D. (2006). Weakening Habermas: The undoing of communicative rationality. Politikon, 33(3), 313−339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340601122950

Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14−22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Andrà, C., Amico, A., Scalvini, C., Doria, L., Liljedahl, P., & Pezzutto, M. (2023). A method for meta-reviews of research unfolding the unavoidable systemic nature of affect. Quadrante, 32(2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.31565

Issue

Section

Articles